Trust / Editorial
Editorial
This page defines the standards governing what we publish: clarity, evidence, and intent. Pages ship when they meet them.
Principles
Evidence over persuasion
If a claim matters, it must be traceable. If it cannot be traced publicly, we either remove it or label it as opinion.
Clarity beats coverage
We publish fewer pages, kept readable over time. Density is allowed; ambiguity is not.
Bounded writing
Each page has a scope. If scope expands, we version it or create a separate page.
Corrections are normal
We correct quickly and visibly. Corrections are a trust signal, not a failure.
No sensitive leakage
Operational competence can be shown without exposing secrets, customer data, or security details.
What we publish
- • Definitions and primitives (Glossary, Pillars)
- • Proof entries (build logs, experiments, releases)
- • Time-bound snapshots (Log)
- • Policies and boundaries (Trust pages)
What we don’t publish
- • Marketing theatre disguised as research
- • Private client details without explicit permission
- • Step-by-step exploitation or sensitive security specifics
- • Unbounded hot takes presented as fact
Evidence tags
When a page makes claims, it should route the reader to the right type of support.
Proof
A claim is backed by an artifact we control and can reference.
Log
A time-bounded snapshot of what changed during a period.
Definition
A canonical term used to reduce ambiguity across pages.
Opinion
Interpretation. Allowed, but explicitly labeled and kept bounded.
Corrections
Corrections are part of the system. We prefer visible honesty over quiet edits.
- • If a factual error is found, we correct it and note what changed.
- • If a page becomes misleading, we either rewrite it, deprecate it, or remove it.
- • If a claim cannot be defended without context, it does not belong on the Authority surface.
Report an issue via [email protected].